← Market intelligence

Japan's GX-ETS explained

Updated 2026-08-17reviewed ESGOS6 sources

How Japan's mandatory emissions trading works — the 100,000-tonne test, the notify-allocate-report-hold cycle, and what a registered confirmation body checks.

This is editorial market intelligence compiled from public sources on the dates shown. It is not legal, tax or compliance advice, and it does not change any organisation's verification status on ESGOS.

Japan’s emissions trading system became a statutory obligation this year. The instrument is the GX Promotion Act as amended, running an annual cycle: notify a target, receive allowances, report actual emissions, hold them, have them retired. This explainer covers each step, whom the Act reaches and what a confirmation body checks.

What it is

The amending Act entered into force on 1 April 2026.1 Before it, the first phase of GX-ETS ran inside the GX League as voluntary emissions trading, with pledges, base-year emissions, results reporting and third-party verification under GX League guidelines.2

The Act’s allowance is a quantity corresponding to the carbon dioxide emitted in an operator’s production, transport and other business activities, expressed in units representing one tonne of carbon dioxide.1 Allocation is governed by an implementation guideline that METI sets under Article 32, covering the allocation rules, the method of evaluating reductions, the setting of target quantities and calculation of actual emissions, the investment being promoted, and matters such as international competitiveness by business field; when METI sets the guideline matters on the business activities whose reductions are especially effective for industrial competitiveness, it must consider using the rate of improvement in emissions per unit of output as the method of evaluating reductions, and before setting or amending the guideline it consults the sector ministers and, on actual emissions, the Minister of the Environment, hears the Industrial Structure Council and publishes it.1

The cycle runs through Articles 33 to 37. An operator notifies its emission target quantity; METI allocates allowances free of charge where the notification is appropriate in light of the guideline, by recording an increase in the operator’s holding account, and may adjust the quantity where the facts behind an earlier notification have changed.1 The operator then reports its actual emissions, METI notifies the corresponding quantity — or determines it on its own investigation where the report is inappropriate — the operator holds that quantity on 31 January of the following fiscal year, and METI retires it that day.1 Allowances may be traded between holders and are not to be the object of speculative trading.1

Price is bounded rather than fixed. METI sets a reference upper transaction price before each fiscal year begins, weighing the effect on industry and daily life, the state of the transition and consistency with energy policy, after hearing the Industrial Structure Council.1 Where trading becomes impossible for a continuous period — cases the Cabinet Order defines by a sustained price above that reference, by a markedly small volume offered at or below it, or by disaster — METI may accept payment of the shortfall at that price and treat the operator as holding the allowances.13 Where the notified quantity is simply not retired, Article 41 has METI collect the un-retired quantity multiplied by the reference upper price and by 1.1, on or after 1 February of the following fiscal year.1

Who it binds

The Act reaches an operator whose annual average CO2 emissions over the three preceding fiscal years reach the amount set by Cabinet Order, and allows the notification to be made jointly with closely related parties investing jointly with it.1 METI’s briefing states that coverage is judged on an operator’s own annual average even where a joint notification is made, and that the emissions measured are direct CO2.4 The briefing expects 300 to 400 companies and close to 60% of Japan’s greenhouse-gas emissions.4

The same operators carry two further duties. Each submits a transition plan every fiscal year to METI and its sector minister, who publish it.1 The penalties attach to the reporting steps rather than the emissions: up to 500,000 yen for failing to notify under Article 33 or to report under Article 35, or doing so falsely, and a non-penal fine of up to 200,000 yen for failing to submit a transition plan.1

Dates

The GX Acceleration Agency’s portal sets out the first-year steps: a covered operator calculates its direct CO2 from 1 April 2026, notifies METI that it is covered by 30 September 2026 and submits its transition plan by 30 September 2026.5 METI’s briefing adds the exception that shapes the rest: target quantities for FY2026 and FY2027 are notified together in FY2027, with both years’ allowances allocated at the end of November 2027, and the FY2026 coverage test uses the mean of direct CO2 in FY2023, FY2024 and FY2025, which is not subject to confirmation-body confirmation.4 In the steady state the holding date is 31 January of the year after the allocation year and the levy runs from 1 February.1 Registration applications for confirmation bodies opened on 5 January 2026, and the portal lists twelve bodies registered by 6 August 2026.5

Thresholds

The Cabinet Order sets the notification threshold at 100,000 tonnes.3 What is counted is prescribed rather than left open: each of the three preceding fiscal years’ emissions is the sum, for each emitting activity, of the activity-scale indicator multiplied by a METI-ordinance conversion coefficient, across prescribed categories of fuel and material use, production and transport of products, crude oil and steam, incineration and combustion, and well operations.3 Against the holding obligation, METI’s briefing states that J-Credit and JCM credits may offset up to 10% of an operator’s emissions and that surplus allowances may be carried over.4

Verification standard

Confirmation sits at both ends of the cycle: the target quantity under Article 33(2) and the actual emissions under Article 35 must each be confirmed in advance by a registered confirmation body.1 A body is registered where it conforms to the ISO and IEC standards for conformity-assessment bodies or similar standards prescribed by METI ordinance, has qualified persons carry out confirmations, holds a sufficient financial basis and has arrangements ensuring fair implementation; registration is renewed at intervals set by Cabinet Order of between five and ten years, set at five years.13

The ordinance fixes the technical standard. A body must have experience verifying or assuring the CO2 emissions of a listed company in accordance with ISO 14064-3 or ISSA 5000 or a similar standard, and each confirmation must be carried out to those standards.6 The person who signs the result must have at least three years’ experience in such work, or ten or more engagements, or be a certified public accountant who is a partner of an audit corporation.6 The quantitative level for judging that nothing material contradicts the guideline method is 5 percent or less of the quantity confirmed, and a body that later finds a change of underlying facts beyond that level, or other material doubt, raises it with the operator, seeks correction and reports to METI if it is not remedied.6 A body asked to confirm does so without delay absent a justifiable reason, works fairly and by the prescribed method, and has the qualified person do the work;1 METI publicly notifies each body’s name, address and registration date.6 Where METI itself confirms, a fee is payable to the State, set by Cabinet Order in three bands by annual average emissions.13

What an organisation on ESGOS can do

An organisation operating in Japan can find its listing in the directory and claim it from its profile page, or get listed and attach what this regime produces: the emissions accounting behind the annual average, the registered confirmation body’s report on the target quantity or actual emissions, and the published transition plan. The verifiers directory lists verification and confirmation bodies by standard, including ISO 14064-3, and the exposure check shows which regimes reach a product and market. None of this changes an organisation’s legal status; it records what has been confirmed, by whom, against which standard.

Footnotes

  1. Act on Promotion of a Smooth Transition to a Decarbonised Growth-Oriented Economic Structure (GX Promotion Act), in-force text, e-Gov Law Search. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17

  2. GX-ETS (Emissions Trading System), GX League / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. ↩

  3. Cabinet Order for Enforcement of the GX Promotion Act, in-force text, e-Gov Law Search. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. Briefing on the Emissions Trading System under the GX Promotion Act (explanatory meeting deck), Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  5. Emissions Trading System portal — About the system, GX Acceleration Agency. ↩ ↩2

  6. Ministerial Ordinance on Registered Confirmation Bodies under the GX Promotion Act, e-Gov Law Search. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

Regimes referenced

From the ESGOS regimes table — facts as recorded there, not a summary of this article.

  • GX-ETS mandatory phasecarbon compliancejurisdiction JPeffective 2026-04-01Coverage is set by the notification threshold, not by a published list of operators. Actual emissions are reported after prior confirmation by a registered confirmation body (Act Art. 35).threshold — notification: 100,000 t annual average CO2 over the three preceding fiscal years (Cabinet Order Art. 2)Source

Organisations on ESGOS

Directory listings matching this article's category and market, in the directory's own order. A tier badge means the organisation has claimed its own listing and had submitted evidence verified. Most listings here carry verifications from public registers and no badge — read the record, not the badge.

Grid & storage in Japan

No organisations listed yet in this category for Japan.

CO2 management in Japan

No organisations listed yet in this category for Japan.

Sources

  1. Act on Promotion of a Smooth Transition to a Decarbonised Growth-Oriented Economic Structure (GX Promotion Act), Act No. 32 of 2023 as amended by Act No. 52 of 2025 — in-force text, e-Gov Law Search (Digital Agency, Japan)retrieved 2026-08-17
  2. Cabinet Order for Enforcement of the GX Promotion Act, Cabinet Order No. 379 of 2023 as amended — in-force text, e-Gov Law Search (Digital Agency, Japan)retrieved 2026-08-17
  3. Ministerial Ordinance on Registered Confirmation Bodies under the GX Promotion Act, e-Gov Law Search (Digital Agency, Japan)retrieved 2026-08-17
  4. Emissions Trading System portal — About the system (排出量取引制度について), GX Acceleration Agency (GX推進機構)retrieved 2026-08-17
  5. Briefing on the Emissions Trading System under the GX Promotion Act, FY2026 (explanatory meeting deck, April 2026), Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, GX Group (hosted by GX Acceleration Agency)retrieved 2026-08-17
  6. GX-ETS (Emissions Trading System) — GX League official site, GX League / Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industryretrieved 2026-08-17
What this article states, and where it comes from
StatementSourceRetrievedConfidence
The amending Act to the GX Promotion Act entered into force on 1 April 2026 (supplementary provisions, Article 1).[1]2026-08-17high
Article 32 of the Act defines the decarbonised growth-oriented investment operator allowance as a quantity corresponding to the carbon dioxide emitted in an operator's production, transport and other business activities, expressed in units representing one tonne of carbon dioxide, and requires METI to set an implementation guideline for allocating it.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 32 requires the implementation guideline to cover basic matters on allocation, the method of evaluating carbon dioxide reductions, the setting of emission target quantities and the calculation of actual emissions including appropriate measurement, the investment to be promoted, and matters to be taken into account such as maintaining or improving international competitiveness by business field; when METI sets the Article 32(2)(iv)(b) matters — the business activities whose carbon dioxide reductions are especially effective for maintaining or improving industrial competitiveness — it must consider using the rate of improvement in emissions per unit of output as the Article 32(2)(ii) method of evaluating reductions, and before setting or amending the guideline it consults the sector ministers and, on actual-emissions matters, the Minister of the Environment, hears the Industrial Structure Council, and publishes the guideline without delay.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 33 of the Act requires an operator whose annual average CO2 emissions over the three preceding fiscal years reach the Cabinet Order amount to notify METI each fiscal year of its average emissions and its emission target quantity.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 2 of the Cabinet Order sets the notification threshold at 100,000 tonnes.[2]2026-08-17high
Article 1 of the Cabinet Order sets how the carbon dioxide emissions of each of the three preceding fiscal years are calculated, as the sum, for each emitting activity, of the activity-scale indicator for that fiscal year multiplied by a conversion coefficient prescribed by METI ordinance, across the use of prescribed fuels, raw materials and other necessary goods, the production and transport of prescribed products, crude oil and steam, the incineration and combustion of prescribed substances, and the exploration, testing and inspection of wells.[2]2026-08-17high
Article 33(4) of the Act allows an operator to make the notification jointly with closely related parties where GX investment is carried out jointly with them.[1]2026-08-17high
The METI briefing states that, even where a joint notification is made, whether an operator is covered is judged on its own annual average emissions, and that the emissions measured for that test are direct CO2 emissions.[5]2026-08-17high
Article 34 provides for free allocation of allowances on the basis of the notified target quantity; Article 36(3) requires the operator to hold allowances equal to its actual emissions on 31 January of the fiscal year following the allocation year; Article 37 retires them on that day.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 34 provides that METI allocates where it finds the notification appropriate in light of the implementation guideline, may adjust the quantity allocated by a Cabinet Order method where the facts underlying an earlier notification are found to have changed, makes the allocation by recording an increase in the operator's corporate holding account and notifying the operator, and consults the sector minister beforehand.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 35 requires the operator to report actual emissions in the following fiscal year, after prior confirmation by a registered confirmation body; Article 33(2) requires the same confirmation for the target quantity.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 36(1) requires METI to notify the operator of the quantity of allowances corresponding to its actual emissions, and Article 36(2) allows METI, where it finds the report inappropriate or otherwise necessary, to determine the quantity to be held on the basis of its own investigation and notify the operator of it.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 38 provides that allowances may be traded between holders and shall not be the object of speculative trading.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 39 requires METI to set the reference upper transaction price before the start of each fiscal year, weighing the effect on Japanese industry and daily life, the state of the transition to a decarbonised growth-oriented economic structure and consistency with energy supply and demand policy; METI may set the prices for later fiscal years at the same time, may revise the price where energy or price conditions change markedly, must hear the Industrial Structure Council before setting or revising it, and publishes it by notice without delay.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 40 of the Act allows METI, in cases prescribed by Cabinet Order where an operator is unable to trade allowances for a continuous period, to give notice and permit payment to the government of an amount equal to the quantity concerned multiplied by the reference upper transaction price, limited to the excess of the notified quantity over the quantity allocated, after which the operator is treated as holding the corresponding allowances.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 6 of the Cabinet Order defines the cases in which trading is treated as difficult under Article 40(1) of the Act as the average transaction price exceeding the reference upper transaction price continuously for a period set by METI ordinance of up to one year, a markedly small quantity of allowances offered for sale at or below the reference upper transaction price, and disaster or other unavoidable circumstances.[2]2026-08-17high
Article 41 provides that an operator that has not had the notified quantity retired pays a levy equal to the un-retired quantity multiplied by the reference upper transaction price and by 1.1, collected on or after 1 February of the fiscal year following the allocation year.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 73 requires the operator to prepare and submit a transition plan every fiscal year to METI and the sector minister, who publish it.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 143 sets a fine of up to 500,000 yen for failing to notify under Article 33 or to report under Article 35, or doing so falsely; Article 148 sets a non-penal fine of up to 200,000 yen for failing to submit a transition plan.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 60(1) of the Act requires METI to register a confirmation body that conforms to the standards for conformity-assessment bodies set by the International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission or similar standards prescribed by METI ordinance, has confirmations carried out by persons with the knowledge and skills prescribed by METI ordinance, has a sufficient financial basis, and has arrangements meeting the standards prescribed for ensuring fair implementation.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 61 of the Act provides that a registration lapses unless renewed at intervals set by Cabinet Order of between five and ten years.[1]2026-08-17high
The Cabinet Order sets the confirmation-body registration validity at five years.[2]2026-08-17high
Article 4 of the ordinance requires a registered confirmation body to have experience verifying or assuring a listed company's CO2 emissions in accordance with ISO 14064-3 or ISSA 5000 or a similar standard; Article 9 requires confirmations to be carried out in accordance with ISO 14064-3 or ISSA 5000 or a similar standard.[3]2026-08-17high
Article 5 of the ordinance requires the person responsible for a confirmation, meaning the person who signs the document recording its result, to have at least three years' experience in verification or assurance work, or to have carried out ten or more such engagements, or to be a certified public accountant who is a partner of an audit corporation or comparable.[3]2026-08-17high
Article 9 of the ordinance sets the quantitative level for judging that nothing material indicates the target quantity or actual emissions were not set or calculated by the implementation guideline method at 5 percent or less of that quantity, and requires a registered confirmation body that later finds a change of underlying facts exceeding that level, or other material doubt, to raise it with the operator, seek correction and report to METI if the matter is not remedied.[3]2026-08-17high
Article 62 of the Act requires a registered confirmation body asked to carry out a confirmation to do so without delay unless there is a justifiable reason, to work fairly and by the method prescribed by METI ordinance, and to have the confirmation carried out by the qualified person referred to in Article 60(1)(ii).[1]2026-08-17high
Article 3 of the METI ordinance requires METI to publicly notify the name, address and registration date of each registered confirmation body.[3]2026-08-17high
Article 75(1) of the Act requires a person seeking a confirmation carried out by METI itself under Article 71(1) to pay the State a fee set by Cabinet Order in the light of actual cost.[1]2026-08-17high
Article 9 of the Cabinet Order sets the fees for confirmations of the emission target quantity under Article 33(2) and of actual emissions under Article 35(2) in three bands by annual average emissions — 100,000 tonnes to under 1,000,000 tonnes, 1,000,000 tonnes to under 10,000,000 tonnes, and 10,000,000 tonnes or more — with a separate scale for each of the two confirmations.[2]2026-08-17high
The portal states that in the first year (FY2026) covered operators calculate direct CO2 from 1 April 2026, notify their coverage by 30 September 2026 and submit a transition plan by 30 September 2026.[4]2026-08-17high
The portal states that registration applications for confirmation bodies opened on 5 January 2026 and lists twelve bodies registered by 6 August 2026.[4]2026-08-17high
The METI briefing states that coverage is expected to reach 300 to 400 companies and close to 60% of Japan's greenhouse-gas emissions.[5]2026-08-17medium
The METI briefing states that, as an exception for FY2026, target quantities for FY2026 and FY2027 are notified together in FY2027 and both years' allowances are allocated at the end of November 2027; the FY2026 average is the mean of direct CO2 in FY2023, FY2024 and FY2025 and is not subject to confirmation-body confirmation.[5]2026-08-17high
The METI briefing states that J-Credit and JCM credits may offset up to 10% of an operator's emissions and that surplus allowances may be carried over to the following year.[5]2026-08-17medium
The GX League page describes the first phase of GX-ETS as voluntary emissions trading with pledges, base-year emissions, results reporting and third-party verification under GX League guidelines.[6]2026-08-17high

This is editorial market intelligence compiled from public sources on the dates shown. It is not legal, tax or compliance advice, and it does not change any organisation's verification status on ESGOS.